Dismissal due to Covid 19 quarantine invalid
The Labour Court Cologne declared the termination of an employment relationship by an employer due to an officially ordered quarantine against his employee to be invalid.
In October 2020, the employee was in domestic quarantine as the contact person of his girlfriend's brother, who had tested positive for Covid-19, by telephone order of the public health department. The employee informed his employer, a small roofing company, of this. The employer doubted the quarantine order and suspected that the employee was only trying to "avoid" work. He demanded a written confirmation from the health authority, which the worker also requested from the health authority by telephone. When this written confirmation from the health authority was not received even after several days, the employer terminated the employment relationship.
The 8th Chamber of the Labour Court of Cologne upheld the action for protection against dismissal.
Admittedly, the Protection Against Dismissal Act did not apply, so that in principle the employer does not have to present a reason for termination to the court for a termination to be legally effective within the time limit. However, the court considered the dismissal to be immoral and in breach of trust. The employee had only complied with the official quarantine order. In the court's view, this was aggravated by the fact that the employer had expressly requested the employee to appear at the workplace contrary to the quarantine order.
The decision can be appealed to the Cologne Regional Labour Court.
Source: Press release of the ArbG Cologne No. 1/2021 of 21.04.2021.
- Legal Tech Act
- Invalidity of the termination of a tenancy agreement
- Influencer means advertising ?
- Employee must prove illness
- Revocation of a car loan agreement
- Liability of a subsidiary for infringement of competition law?
- Interest on tax demands and refunds at 6% p.a. unconstitutional
- Data owned by employer
- Weakening of tenants' rights
- Right of withdrawal for brokerage contracts
- BFH, ruling of 23 March 2016, IV R 9/14: Investment deduction amount
- Cartel damage
- Right abuse
- Setting a deadline
- Protection of third parties
- Internet sales platform
- Bonus payments
- Formal requirements in general terms and conditions
- Termination of a management employment
- No cosmetic repairs at the apartment despite "renovation agreement"
- Income tax return due to loan default
- ECJ ruling on copyright infrigements on Youtube
- Gift invalid without notarial certification
- Minimum subsistence Germany 2019-2020
- revocability of employment termination agreements
- Cover under legal expenses insurance
- Termination without notice
- Labour law: leave
- Immigration of qualified staff
- Unpaid leave
- Tax law: liability of a foreign company in germany
- Custom law ruling
- Labour law: compensation adjustment for lawyer fees
- Termination without notice
- Tenancy law
- Immediate notice of dismissal
- Damages in case of violation of a jurisdiction agreement
- Corona quarantine: legal aspects
- No termination without notice
- Labour law decisions around Corona
- Dismissal due to Covid 19 quarantine invalid